Thoughts of an Existentialist

I only realized I was actually an existentialist when after having a conversation with a prominent artist, I was told this—that I am the first of my kind he had come to know. I have forgotten what things I said to make him have such a conclusion aside from “hey, do you want to know my background? I’m a philosophy major slash an existentialist!” but considering he was of a great stature already, I can’t help but be convinced that maybe I really am one.

More than anything else, I, as an existentialist, live in the present. What happened before now are mere memories, what will happen tomorrow are plans if they are realistic, fantasies if they are not, and wishful thinking if they involve some form of romance. My mood swings from angst to gratefulness to sadness almost at random, but fortunately, more often than not, I am glad I exist. Suffice it to say that the only time I am sure of what I would feel is when the feeling is self-induced.

Before, every single moment of my waking life, the only things I have were questions—the typical “why are things are and why do they happen as they do.” Everything was about finding a purpose, a reason, all the blahs just so to assure myself that I am not just an empty shell, that I have—if I were, say, a book or a song—content. My telling this would already give you the idea that yeah, I have changed my mind yet again.

First off, I’ve been given life. Secondly, I then accepted it. There now my problems start with the third stage, what do I do with it? And yet again, I was given choices; there the problems escalate even more. Then soon it catches up on me, the fear that the moment I finally make a choice is when I’m in my deathbed already. So it is that I have decided to come original. Actually, since I am an existentialist, I am supposed to be an original character. Existence comes first, then poof! everything else comes following suit. So the point of all this? There is none. That’s what I do, I let my mind race until it comes upon a temporary conclusion, which could hold my sanity awhile. Then when I feel that I need new thoughts as the previous ones’ wonder have faded already, I then think some more, or not.

To balance the more-often-than-seldom tiring clockwork of my mind, I do sports. I run, I swim, I get a baseball bat and swing as hard as I could—I do these to lose consciousness of my thoughts. I am convinced that the human body has workings that is detached from the mind—not to mention as examples the brainwork and heartbeats that are involuntary. There is also one thing about sports that I like—this is not my phrase—“bragging rights.” Whether we accept it or not, bragging feels good. Winning feels good. And in sports, the winner can brag as much—in fact, the winner has to brag so the loser don’t feel so bad about his loss. The lack of complexity of this really appeals to me.

I heard a friend say something about writers/columnists having this certain air about them when they write. I agreed. They really do have this “read me and my opinions matter” attitude. I may have that too, or not. I could have “read me or not, I’ll live.” But that’s even worse. I think I prefer, “Got time to spare? Read me when you got nothing better to do than die.” I think that would be my writer’s motto.

If I am to continue on with this kind of arrogance, I see no wrong coming out of it. I would never know how the world really is like from another’s eye, not close to the things I could come upon using my own vision. No, I do not wish to deny another’s views; I only want to use my own as none but me could ever do so. Yeah, a form of a universal individuality—when everyone is an individualist, then that’s one thing we would all have in common.

I am glad and saddened at the same time at how the world has become, for me at least. It is a question to me, of great magnitude, how knowing more people could sometimes be a sad thing. I tend to forget a past love in exchange for a new greater love. Is there something wrong with that? Have I then become too swaying that I no longer can hold on to just one founded truth.

The year is about to end, and it is a fact that this year has been my best so far. And I know I would be saying that next year too. Is that wrong? Going on with life knowing that things aren’t in their best form now—that tomorrow would be better. This is optimism, and I am supposed to be hopeful, not disturbed with this knowledge. Yet, I am. But then again there is the aspect on reality and physical and pleasure stuff. If only my imaginations are not so vivid as to actually almost mimic reality. Yeah, sometimes knowing is enough for me already. The fear of becoming sad after euphoric experiences with things fleeting has made me opt for things more lasting.

This is one of the things I’m not good at—endings. Like conversations, I had a friend tell me before that “you don’t end conversations, you abandon it.” Maybe it can also apply to writing. But my being an existentialist makes creating endings a kind of practice for my own death. I am highly amazed with people who go through life knowing that death would be the only one meeting them in the end. At least with things like this, I know that I can always make another one. With life, well, maybe God also thinks, when I die, that “Well, I can always create another one,” without care for what I might be feeling after death. Alike me now, I end this, without caring; for these, anyway, are only thoughts, words.

(December 2006)